Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Buddhism

Buddhism articles by quality and importance Quality Importance Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total FA 1 4 3 8 FL 3 3 A 1 1 GA 4 10 24 28 66 B 28 75 95 254 20 472 C 50 81 197 947 25 1,300 Start 35 82 430 2,123 31 2,701 Stub 2 9 124 1,604 24 1,763 List 3 1 8 91 1 104 Category 2,145 2,145 Disambig 15 15 File 23 23 Project 12 12 Template 141 141 NA 4 6 16 64 74 164 Other 2 35 37 Assessed 126 265 899 5,119 2,446 100 8,955 Unassessed 1 6 7 Total 126 265 899 5,120 2,446 106 8,962 WikiWork factors (?) ω = 30,793 Ω = 4.88

Deyangshar

This stub has been unsourced for 15 years. I can't find any reliable English sources. Can you help? Bearian (talk) 03:00, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Kim Pu-sik#Requested move 22 February 2025

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Kim Pu-sik#Requested move 22 February 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPath^talk 12:40, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

Angkor Wat at FAR

I have nominated Angkor Wat for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Z1720 (talk) 16:06, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

Request for Help With Notability of Santikaro Biographical Article

Hello! I'm working on a draft Wikipedia article about '''Santikaro''' – an American Buddhist teacher and translator of Buddhadasa Bhikkhu. The draft was declined with the note that it lacks sufficient ''significant coverage'' in reliable, independent, secondary sources.

I'm reaching out to ask for help identifying sources that might support notability – especially those that provide more than just a passing mention. Specifically, I'm looking for:

• Academic or Buddhist studies publications that discuss his work
• Media coverage of his teachings, translations, or role in Western Buddhism
• Reviews or discussions of his translations of Buddhadasa
• Biographical features or in-depth interviews in reliable outlets

So far, I’ve located some retreat center bios, brief mentions on Buddhist websites, and a few podcast appearances. However, these don’t meet the threshold for secondary sources that are both ''independent'' and show ''significant coverage''.

If anyone is aware of any qualifying sources – or has suggestions on where to look – I’d be very grateful!

The draft can be found here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Santikaro

Please feel free to modify this draft as you believe is necessary to make it accepted, if you believe that there is something that can be done. Or you can let me know what changes you think would be good. This draft is not encyclopedic enough, for sure - and some of the things I have known about Santikaro are not fully supported. I have no problem if this draft becomes much shorter, but a fully objective and encyclopedic article, as Wikipedia requires. I have to be away for one month (retreat) before I can work on this again.

Thanks in advance! Peaceful-D (talk) 15:24, 25 April 2025 (UTC)